<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Religion on Brambles</title><link>https://brambles.joshuapritikin.com/tags/religion/</link><description>Recent content in Religion on Brambles</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 22:42:21 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brambles.joshuapritikin.com/tags/religion/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>What's Different in Carse 2025?</title><link>https://brambles.joshuapritikin.com/posts/carse-comparison/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://brambles.joshuapritikin.com/posts/carse-comparison/</guid><description>&lt;p>How does &lt;em>The Religious Case Against Belief&lt;/em> (2008)
compare with &lt;a href="https://carse-2025.pritikin.eth.limo/docs/intro/">&lt;em>The Religious Case Against Belief&lt;/em> (J. N. Pritikin, Trans.; 2nd ed.) (2025)&lt;/a>?&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="structure-and-content">
 Structure and Content
 &lt;a class="anchor" href="#structure-and-content">#&lt;/a>
&lt;/h2>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>The second edition includes a new front matter section explaining the adaptation process&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Material is significantly reorganized, with content moved between chapters&lt;/li>
&lt;li>The &lt;em>Religion Beyond Belief&lt;/em> and &lt;em>Coda&lt;/em> chapters have been removed or relocated&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Overall word count reduced by 46%&lt;/li>
&lt;li>The second edition includes bibliography sections not in the original&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;h2 id="writing-style-and-accessibility">
 Writing Style and Accessibility
 &lt;a class="anchor" href="#writing-style-and-accessibility">#&lt;/a>
&lt;/h2>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Sentence structure&lt;/strong>: The second edition uses shorter, simpler sentences compared to the original&amp;rsquo;s longer, more complex constructions&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Vocabulary&lt;/strong>: Original uses more academic and specialized terminology; second edition employs more straightforward language&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Examples&lt;/strong>: Second edition includes more concrete, contemporary examples to illustrate abstract concepts&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Paragraph length&lt;/strong>: Original has longer paragraphs with multiple connected ideas; second edition breaks these into smaller, focused paragraphs&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Transitions&lt;/strong>: Second edition adds clearer transitional phrases to guide readers between concepts&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;h2 id="scholarly-apparatus-and-references">
 Scholarly Apparatus and References
 &lt;a class="anchor" href="#scholarly-apparatus-and-references">#&lt;/a>
&lt;/h2>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Citation style&lt;/strong>: Second edition uses numerical footnote references that link to a formal bibliography&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Source documentation&lt;/strong>: More extensive citations and references in the second edition&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Tables and visual elements&lt;/strong>: Second edition includes tables (like the attributes of a mature belief system)&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Academic conventions&lt;/strong>: Second edition follows more formal academic presentation conventions&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;h2 id="audience-considerations">
 Audience Considerations
 &lt;a class="anchor" href="#audience-considerations">#&lt;/a>
&lt;/h2>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Educational accessibility&lt;/strong>: Second edition is written at a high school rather than post-graduate reading level&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Religious audience&lt;/strong>: Second edition frames arguments in a way intended to be more respectful to religious readers&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Academic readers&lt;/strong>: Original appears more targeted toward scholarly/academic audience&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>General public&lt;/strong>: Second edition attempts to make complex philosophical concepts more accessible to non-specialists&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;h2 id="content-organization-and-development">
 Content Organization and Development
 &lt;a class="anchor" href="#content-organization-and-development">#&lt;/a>
&lt;/h2>
&lt;h3 id="structural-reformatting">
 Structural Reformatting
 &lt;a class="anchor" href="#structural-reformatting">#&lt;/a>
&lt;/h3>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Hierarchical organization&lt;/strong>: The original presents ideas in relatively undifferentiated prose blocks; the second edition implements a systematic hierarchical structure with numbered sections and subsections (e.g., chapters like &lt;em>Belief&lt;/em> have explicit sections on &lt;em>Intensity&lt;/em>, &lt;em>Faith&lt;/em>, &lt;em>Formation of Belief Systems&lt;/em>)&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Topic segmentation&lt;/strong>: Original flows between topics without clear transitions; second edition creates distinct sections with explicit headers (e.g., separate sections on &lt;em>Galileo&amp;rsquo;s Trial&lt;/em> and &lt;em>Stepping Deeper into Ignorance&lt;/em>)&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Logical progression&lt;/strong>: Second edition reorganizes material to create a more linear path through complex concepts, while the original has a more associative flow&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;h3 id="the-new-ignorance-chapter">
 The New &lt;em>Ignorance&lt;/em> Chapter
 &lt;a class="anchor" href="#the-new-ignorance-chapter">#&lt;/a>
&lt;/h3>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Taxonomic approach&lt;/strong>: Creates a formal three-part taxonomy (ordinary, willful, and higher ignorance) that serves as a conceptual foundation&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Galileo reframing&lt;/strong>: Repositions the Galileo material as an exemplar of different types of ignorance rather than primarily as an example of belief conflict&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Conceptual scaffolding&lt;/strong>: Provides preparatory concepts that readers need before encountering the central arguments about belief&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Integration function&lt;/strong>: Connects historical examples to abstract philosophical concepts more systematically&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;h3 id="case-studies-and-examples">
 Case Studies and Examples
 &lt;a class="anchor" href="#case-studies-and-examples">#&lt;/a>
&lt;/h3>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Enhanced structure&lt;/strong>: Original presents the Martin Luther case study in an uninterrupted narrative; second edition breaks it into explicitly labeled sections like &lt;em>Luther&amp;rsquo;s Legacy&lt;/em>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Comparative examples&lt;/strong>: Second edition adds more structured comparative examples (like the parallel between religious and military language)&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Contemporary relevance&lt;/strong>: Second edition adds more explicit connections to modern issues (e.g., unlawful orders in military contexts, enhanced discussion of willful ignorance in politics)&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Visual distinction&lt;/strong>: Case studies are more clearly marked off from theoretical material in the second edition&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;h3 id="argumentative-architecture">
 Argumentative Architecture
 &lt;a class="anchor" href="#argumentative-architecture">#&lt;/a>
&lt;/h3>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Premise-conclusion structure&lt;/strong>: Second edition more explicitly marks the premises of arguments before presenting conclusions&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Counter-argument integration&lt;/strong>: More systematic presentation of objections and responses in the second edition&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Concept mapping&lt;/strong>: Second edition creates clearer relationships between related concepts through explicit signposting&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Summary elements&lt;/strong>: Addition of summative sections at chapter ends in the second edition&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;h2 id="conceptual-development-and-focus">
 Conceptual Development and Focus
 &lt;a class="anchor" href="#conceptual-development-and-focus">#&lt;/a>
&lt;/h2>
&lt;h3 id="higher-ignorance-advancement">
 Higher Ignorance Advancement
 &lt;a class="anchor" href="#higher-ignorance-advancement">#&lt;/a>
&lt;/h3>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Conceptual primacy&lt;/strong>: In the original, higher ignorance is one important concept among many; in the second edition, it becomes the central organizing principle&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Definition expansion&lt;/strong>: Second edition provides a more detailed explanation of higher ignorance through extended examples&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Historical contextualization&lt;/strong>: Second edition connects higher ignorance to thinkers like Nicholas of Cusa more systematically&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Application range&lt;/strong>: Second edition shows more explicitly how higher ignorance applies across different religious traditions&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;h3 id="belief-system-analysis">
 Belief System Analysis
 &lt;a class="anchor" href="#belief-system-analysis">#&lt;/a>
&lt;/h3>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Formation process&lt;/strong>: Second edition adds a more detailed analysis of how belief systems form and develop (with a table of features like &amp;ldquo;Comprehensive Explanation,&amp;rdquo; &amp;ldquo;Ultimate Authority,&amp;rdquo; etc.)&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Psychological dimension&lt;/strong>: Enhanced discussion of the psychological factors that contribute to belief formation and maintenance&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Opposing functions&lt;/strong>: More systematic analysis of how belief systems define themselves against others&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Internal contradictions&lt;/strong>: More structured presentation of the contradictions inherent in belief systems&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;h3 id="religion-belief-relationship">
 Religion-Belief Relationship
 &lt;a class="anchor" href="#religion-belief-relationship">#&lt;/a>
&lt;/h3>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Boundary clarification&lt;/strong>: Second edition creates clearer distinctions between religion and the belief systems that form around them&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Identity preservation&lt;/strong>: More detailed discussion of how religions maintain their identity over millennia despite changing belief systems&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Community dynamics&lt;/strong>: Enhanced discussion of how religious communities function differently from belief-based communities&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Transcendence mechanism&lt;/strong>: More explicit explanation of how religion transcends the limitations of belief systems&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;h3 id="contemporary-applications">
 Contemporary Applications
 &lt;a class="anchor" href="#contemporary-applications">#&lt;/a>
&lt;/h3>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Modern relevance&lt;/strong>: Second edition draws more connections to contemporary religious and political conflicts&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Secularization analysis&lt;/strong>: More detailed discussion of how secular belief systems mimic religious structures&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Political religion&lt;/strong>: Enhanced analysis of how political ideologies function as pseudo-religions&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Media influence&lt;/strong>: New material on how information environments affect belief formation&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;h3 id="interdisciplinary-integration">
 Interdisciplinary Integration
 &lt;a class="anchor" href="#interdisciplinary-integration">#&lt;/a>
&lt;/h3>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Psychological integration&lt;/strong>: Second edition more explicitly incorporates concepts from psychology (like &lt;em>locus of control&lt;/em>)&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Sociological framing&lt;/strong>: Enhanced discussion of how belief systems function socially&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Historical contextualization&lt;/strong>: More systematic use of historical examples to illustrate theoretical points&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Linguistic analysis&lt;/strong>: More detailed discussion of religious language and how it functions differently from belief statements&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;h3 id="practical-implications">
 Practical Implications
 &lt;a class="anchor" href="#practical-implications">#&lt;/a>
&lt;/h3>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Applied ethics&lt;/strong>: Second edition draws more explicit ethical implications from the theoretical framework&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Dialogical practice&lt;/strong>: More detailed suggestions for how to engage with beliefs differently&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Cultural navigation&lt;/strong>: Enhanced discussion of how to engage with various belief systems productively&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Self-examination&lt;/strong>: More explicit invitation for readers to examine their own belief systems critically&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item><item><title>Singularism v. Utah County et al</title><link>https://brambles.joshuapritikin.com/posts/singularism-2025/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://brambles.joshuapritikin.com/posts/singularism-2025/</guid><description>&lt;p>The judge&amp;rsquo;s approach to religious sincerity in the Jensen case provides a practical example that aligns with &lt;a href="https://carse-2025.pritikin.eth.limo/docs/intro/">Carse&amp;rsquo;s understanding of religion&lt;/a>.&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="the-judges-determination-of-religious-sincerity">
 The Judge&amp;rsquo;s Determination of Religious Sincerity
 &lt;a class="anchor" href="#the-judges-determination-of-religious-sincerity">#&lt;/a>
&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>In the &lt;a href="https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/utah/utdce/2:2024cv00887/152420/56/">court document&lt;/a>, the judge states: &amp;ldquo;At the hearing, Plaintiffs presented the testimony of several witnesses to establish the sincerity of their religion. The court found the witnesses credible and ruled that Plaintiffs had shown a likelihood of success on their claim under the Utah RFRA.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>The Religious Case for Simplicity</title><link>https://brambles.joshuapritikin.com/posts/carse-2025/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://brambles.joshuapritikin.com/posts/carse-2025/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="the-professor-and-the-engineer">
 The Professor and the Engineer
 &lt;a class="anchor" href="#the-professor-and-the-engineer">#&lt;/a>
&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>On a rainy Tuesday afternoon in early March, I found myself hunched over not one but two versions of James P. Carse&amp;rsquo;s philosophical masterpiece, &lt;em>The Religious Case Against Belief&lt;/em>. The first—dog-eared and coffee-stained—was Carse&amp;rsquo;s original 2008 publication. The second—&lt;a href="https://carse-2025.pritikin.eth.limo/docs/intro/">pristine and unauthorized&lt;/a>—was a dramatically condensed edition that has been stirring controversy in religious and publishing circles alike.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The unauthorized second edition, prepared by software engineer and religious studies enthusiast Joshua Pritikin, has been described as both &amp;ldquo;literary vandalism&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;an act of spiritual generosity,&amp;rdquo; depending on whom you ask. Released without Penguin Random House&amp;rsquo;s permission, it reduces Carse&amp;rsquo;s dense philosophical prose by nearly half. Entire chapters have vanished. Technical passages have been recast in simpler language.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Navigating Psilomethoxin: Josh’s Research &amp; Practical Advice</title><link>https://brambles.joshuapritikin.com/posts/pm-interview-2024sep/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://brambles.joshuapritikin.com/posts/pm-interview-2024sep/</guid><description>&lt;p>Episode 7 of The Sacred Synthesis Podcast&lt;/p>
&lt;iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/v97zlQ7OUZE?si=6j9-PRcT6ewYfMgm" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen>&lt;/iframe></description></item><item><title>Chat about Sacred Synthesis and Psilomethoxin</title><link>https://brambles.joshuapritikin.com/posts/pm-interview-2024jun/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://brambles.joshuapritikin.com/posts/pm-interview-2024jun/</guid><description>&lt;iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ZgjZcLsdFk4?si=ql-GaJ8kV4b7YbSt" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen>&lt;/iframe></description></item><item><title>The alphabet versus the goddess (1999)</title><link>https://brambles.joshuapritikin.com/posts/alphabet-vs-goddess/</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://brambles.joshuapritikin.com/posts/alphabet-vs-goddess/</guid><description>&lt;p>Many assume that the invention of a phonetic alphabet only brought
benefits. In a somewhat speculative reassessment of history, Shlain
makes the case that the phonetic alphabet advanced lawyer-style
thinking that greatly facilitated the justification of violence.
The book is unlikely to be 100% true, but also unlikely to be 100% false.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&amp;lt;&amp;mdash;&amp;gt;&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Shlain, L. (1999). &lt;em>The alphabet versus the goddess: The conflict between word and image.&lt;/em> Penguin.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>